Councillor questions where cash will come from; residents angry park is still years away
“The people of False Creek have been waiting 25 years for the delivery of Creekside Park.
ADRIANE CARR, GREEN PARTY COUNCILLOR
29 Oct 2015, The Vancouver Sun, JOHN MACKIE
jmackie@vancouversun.com
To listen to City of Vancouver staff, tearing down the Georgia and Dunsmuir viaducts will be a win-win.
There
won’t be much effect on traffic, there will be a bigger Creekside Park,
and the $200-million cost of tearing down the massive structures will
be covered by a projected $300 million in community amenity
contributions, development cost levies and land sales in the
neighbourhood.
But there are skeptics, including NPA Coun. George Affleck.
“They’re
saying that the costs will be underwritten by the project in a
mysterious way,” Affleck said. “From what I can tell, it looks like they
will be raiding the community amenity contributions from across the
city to underwrite the costs of this.”
Community amenity contributions are fees the city collects from developers to pay for things like parks and daycares.
Affleck
questions whether the city will be able to squeeze the projected $300
million out of a developer like Concord Pacific, which owns a big chunk
of land near the viaducts.
“I don’t see that math
adding up,” Affleck said. “The Concord deal is a provincial deal. There
are limitations to what we can extract unless the province decides to
change their deal with Concord.”
(The Concord Pacific land was purchased from the province in 1988, when the company bought the former Expo 86 site.)
Affleck’s concerns were dismissed by Vision Coun. Geoff Meggs.
“The
staff gave assurances as well that the revenue opportunities are
significant,” Meggs said. “They come from the site. They’re not going to
be imposed on people from around the city.”
Most
of the criticism of the plan for the viaducts was levelled at the
timeline for Creekside Park, which may not be finished for another
decade.
False Creek residents have been angry at
the city and Concord Pacific for years because of delays in completing
the park — there are an estimated 1,500 green lights hanging in windows
throughout the neighbourhood as a protest.
On
Tuesday, council voted in favour of a staff recommendation to tear down
the viaducts. Green Coun. Adriane Carr tried to add an amendment that
stated the park should be finished by 2024, but was rebuffed.
“The
people of False Creek have been waiting 25 years for the delivery of
Creekside Park,” she said. “Supposedly bringing down the viaducts will
facilitate the faster development of that park, and certainly Vision has
been lauding the park delivery as a key part of the viaducts decision.
“(But)
when I put it into the form of an amendment, they said that would be a
false promise, and they couldn’t necessarily deliver it, and it was out
of our hands.”
Meggs voted against amendment.
“Coun.
Carr’s motion would have required us to complete the park, whether or
not the financial arrangements were in line with what Concord’s legal
obligations are,” he said. “The delivery of the park is triggered by
rezoning. And the rezoning can’t occur until the park configuration is
confirmed, which we did last night. (But) there still has to be
important negotiations with Carr’s Concord, and
they have to satisfy staff and council that they’re making the
appropriate contributions to the park, daycare, to whatever the other
community amenity contributions are.”
That wasn’t good enough for False Creek resident John Murray.
“They
keep saying, ‘Look, the viaducts come down and you are going to get
this outstanding, beautiful, bigger, better park,’” Murray said.
“They
don’t say that this is a park that is 25 years overdue, and actually
all we’re doing is shuffling things around, and you’re getting the same
size park except it’s going to be fragmented, and the developer is
getting more waterfront property.
“That is basically what is happening, and we’re frustrated to no end with that.”
Murray
said in 2004 the city rewrote a provision in the Concord Pacific deal
that allowed it to delay building the park. He would like to see the
city play hardball with the company and speed things up.
“Other
developers have had to come up front with a park, or cash in lieu,” he
said. “Bosa did that way back in the ’90s, and Concord has been able to
keep going on (without building a park).
“They’re actually making money off all that land and not paying any taxes, and they’ve put nothing up front.”
Provincial
Transportation Minister Todd Stone weighed in on the viaducts issue
from Victoria, where he told reporters it has been “a number of years
since the city took meaningful steps to reach out to PavCo, which owns
and operates BC Place (Stadium).”
It is unclear
what Stone’s issues with the city’s plans were. The proposed Georgia
Street extension would go over top of Griffiths Way, a street that
trucks use to load equipment at the stadium.
“What
we have said to the city is any of these changes must take into account
our load-in,” PavCo’s Duncan Blomfeld said. “The city came back to us
and told us it won’t affect the load-in and load-out of the stadium.”
(c) 2015, The Vancouver Sun, JOHN MACKIE
jmackie@vancouversun.com